
The piece argues that chasing the objectively "best" car in a category often means overpaying for features you don't need, when a slightly less acclaimed alternative delivers the same real-world satisfaction at lower cost. This is a useful corrective to the enthusiast tendency to obsess over rankings and spec sheets rather than thinking about actual value—what matters is whether a car meets your needs, not whether it tops some publication's hierarchy. The insight applies whether you're buying new or used: the second-best sedan might be the smarter choice if it costs significantly less and does everything you actually require. It's a reminder that automotive journalism's job is partly to help readers spend wisely, not just to crown winners.
Auto Express’ consumer reporter gives his expert insight on why choosing the best car in a sector might not always be wise